The Cross-Education Effect of Unilateral Arm Training on Contralateral Muscle Strength and EMG Activity: The Modulatory Roles of tDCS and Practical BFR

Authors

    Behzad Taheri Exercise Physiology Department, Sports Sciences Faculty, University of Mazandaran, Babolsar, Iran
    Fatemeh Nikseresht Assistant Professor, Department of Physical Education, Farhangian University, Tehran, Iran
    Khadijeh Irandoust * Department of Physical Education, Imam Khomeini International University, Qazvin, Iran irandoust@soc.ikiu.ac.ir
    Ziya Fallah Mohammadi Exercise Physiology Department, Sports Sciences Faculty, University of Mazandaran, Babolsar, Iran
    Somayeh Namdar Tajari Department of Motor Behavior, Faculty of Sports Science, University of Mazandaran, Babolsar, Iran

Keywords:

Cross-education, Blood flow restriction, tDCS, Strength, Neural adaptation

Abstract

Cross-education refers to strength gains in the untrained limb following unilateral training. Blood flow restriction (BFR) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) are known to induce peripheral and neural adaptations, respectively. This study investigated whether combining unilateral BFR and tDCS enhances cross-education effects in the untrained arm. Thirty-eight healthy young men were randomly assigned to four groups: tDCS-pBFR, Sham-pBFR, tDCS, and Control. Over four weeks, participants performed unilateral dumbbell curl training (30% 1RM, 3 sessions/week). The primary outcomes for the untrained arm were one-repetition maximum (1RM), arm muscle circumference (AMC), and electromyography (EMG) activity. ANCOVA with pre-test as covariate was used for statistical analysis. Strength of the untrained arm (1RM) increased significantly in tDCS-pBFR and Sham-pBFR groups compared with control (p < 0.05), while AMC changes were significant only in Sham-pBFR. EMG activity did not differ significantly among groups. No significant difference was observed between tDCS-pBFR and Sham-pBFR groups. Unilateral BFR training, with or without tDCS, produces cross-education effects in the contralateral untrained arm. Strength improvements appear to be primarily mediated by neural adaptations, with limited changes in muscle size or EMG activity. These findings support the use of BFR and neuromodulatory interventions to enhance contralateral strength, particularly in rehabilitation settings.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Riebe D, Ehrman JK, Liguori G, Magal M. ACSM’s guidelines for exercise testing and prescription: American College of Sports Medicine; 2018.

2. Schoenfeld BJ. The mechanisms of muscle hypertrophy and their application to resistance training. The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research. 2010;24 (10):2857-72.

3. Grgic J, Schoenfeld BJ, Orazem J, Sabol F. Effects of resistance training performed to repetition failure or non-failure on muscular strength and hypertrophy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of sport and health science. 2022;11 (2):202-11.

4. Kraemer W. Fundamentals of resistance training: progression and exercise prescription. Medicine & science in sports & exercise. 2004.

5. Patterson SD, Hughes L, Warmington S, Burr J, Scott BR, Owens J, et al. Blood flow restriction exercise: considerations of methodology, application, and safety. Frontiers in physiology. 2019;10:533.

6. Enoka RM. Neural adaptations with chronic physical activity. Journal of biomechanics. 1997;30 (5):447-55.

7. Taheri B, Fallahmohammadi Z, Irandoust K, Tajari SN. The effect of low-intensity resistance training with practical blood flow restriction (pBFR) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on thickness, strength and electrical activity of biceps brachii muscle in healthy men. Sport Sciences for Health. 2024:1-9.

8. Taheri B, Fallahmohammadi Z, Irandoust K, Tajari SN. Journal of Advanced Sport Technology. Technology. 2025;8 (3):37-48.

9. Nitsche MA, Paulus W. Excitability changes induced in the human motor cortex by weak transcranial direct current stimulation. The Journal of physiology. 2000;527 (Pt 3):633.

10. Angius L, Hopker J, Mauger AR. The ergogenic effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on exercise performance. Frontiers in physiology. 2017;8:90.

11. Hendy AM, Teo W-P, Kidgell DJ. Anodal tDCS prolongs the cross-education of strength and corticospinal plasticity. Brain Stimulation. 2015;8 (2):362-3.

12. Hikosaka M, Aramaki Y. Effects of bilateral transcranial direct current stimulation on simultaneous bimanual handgrip strength. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. 2021;15:674851.

13. Manca A, Dragone D, Dvir Z, Deriu F. Cross-education of muscular strength following unilateral resistance training: a meta-analysis. European journal of applied physiology. 2017;117 (11):2335-54.

14. Zhou S. Chronic neural adaptations to unilateral exercise: mechanisms of cross education. Exercise and sport sciences reviews. 2000;28 (4):177-84.

15. Taheri B, Fallahmohammadi Z, Irandoust K, Tajari SN. The effect of low-intensity resistance training with practical blood flow restriction (pBFR) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on thickness, strength and electrical activity of biceps brachii muscle in healthy men. Sport Sciences for Health. 2025;21 (2):585-93.

16. Nitsche MA, Schauenburg A, Lang N, Liebetanz D, Exner C, Paulus W, et al. Facilitation of implicit motor learning by weak transcranial direct current stimulation of the primary motor cortex in the human. Journal of cognitive neuroscience. 2003;15 (4):619-26.

17. Manini TM, Clark BC. Blood flow restricted exercise and skeletal muscle health. Exercise and sport sciences reviews. 2009;37 (2):78-85.

18. Clark BC, Manini T, Hoffman R, Williams P, Guiler M, Knutson M, et al. Relative safety of 4 weeks of blood flow‐restricted resistance exercise in young, healthy adults. Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports. 2011;21 (5):653-62.

19. Wilson JM, Lowery RP, Joy JM, Loenneke JP, Naimo MA. Practical blood flow restriction training increases acute determinants of hypertrophy without increasing indices of muscle damage. The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research. 2013;27 (11):3068-75.

20. Brzycki M. Strength testing—predicting a one-rep max from reps-to-fatigue. Journal of physical education, recreation & dance. 1993;64 (1):88-90.

21. Grodner M, Anderson SL, DeYoung S. Foundations and clinical applications of nutrition: a nursing approach: Mosby Inc.; 2000.

22. Frisancho AR. Anthropometric standards for the assessment of growth and nutritional status: University of Michigan press; 1990.

23. Adams R. Revised Physical Activity Readiness Questionnaire. Canadian Family Physician. 1999;45:992.

24. Yasuda T, Brechue WF, Fujita T, Shirakawa J, Sato Y, Abe T. Muscle activation during low-intensity muscle contractions with restricted blood flow. Journal of sports sciences. 2009;27 (5):479-89.

Downloads

Published

2025-09-10

Submitted

2025-07-11

Revised

2025-08-27

Accepted

2025-09-03

How to Cite

taheri, behzad, Nikseresht, F., Irandoust, K., Fallah Mohammadi, Z. ., & Namdar Tajari, S. . (2025). The Cross-Education Effect of Unilateral Arm Training on Contralateral Muscle Strength and EMG Activity: The Modulatory Roles of tDCS and Practical BFR. Game Nexus, 2(3), 1-11. https://game-nexus.org/index.php/gamenexus/article/view/31