Stress-Appraisal Profiles During High-Intensity Mini-Games: Athletes’ Lived Experiences
Keywords:
Stress appraisal, challenge and threat, athletes’ experiences, mini-games, coping strategies, qualitative research, South AfricaAbstract
This study aimed to explore how athletes cognitively and emotionally appraise stress during high-intensity mini-games, with a focus on their lived experiences of challenge and threat profiles. A qualitative design was adopted, drawing on a phenomenological approach to capture athletes’ subjective experiences. Twenty-five athletes (14 males, 11 females) from diverse sporting backgrounds in South Africa participated, all with at least three years of competitive experience. Semi-structured, in-depth interviews were conducted until theoretical saturation was reached. Each interview lasted 45–70 minutes, was audio-recorded, and transcribed verbatim. Data were analyzed thematically using NVivo 14 software. Themes were developed through iterative coding, review, and consensus discussions to ensure credibility and rigor. Four overarching themes emerged. First, cognitive appraisal of stress reflected athletes’ interpretations of demands, resources, and situational awareness, with fluctuations between challenge and threat orientations. Second, emotional and physiological responses revealed both energizing states such as excitement and maladaptive states such as anxiety, with athletes also reporting physiological markers like accelerated heart rate or fatigue. Third, social and contextual influences underscored the roles of teammates, coaches, spectators, and cultural identity in shaping stress appraisals. Finally, coping and adaptation strategies included problem-focused approaches (e.g., tactical adjustments), emotion-focused strategies (e.g., self-talk, humor), and long-term resilience-building, with many athletes reframing stress as an opportunity for growth. Collectively, these findings confirm that stress appraisal in mini-games is a dynamic, socially embedded, and meaning-laden process. The study extends the challenge–threat framework by demonstrating how athletes’ lived experiences integrate physiological, emotional, social, and cultural dimensions of stress appraisal. Insights highlight the need for interventions that not only enhance physiological conditioning but also address appraisal processes, resilience, and context-sensitive coping strategies.
Downloads
References
1. Meijen C, Turner MJ, Jones MV, Sheffield D, McCarthy P. A Theory of Challenge and Threat States in Athletes: A Revised Conceptualization. Frontiers in Psychology. 2020;11. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00126.
2. Hase A, Rot Mah, Azevedo RdM, Freeman P. Threat-Related Motivational Disengagement: Integrating Blunted Cardiovascular Reactivity to Stress Into the Biopsychosocial Model of Challenge and Threat. Anxiety Stress & Coping. 2020;33(4):355-69. doi: 10.1080/10615806.2020.1755819.
3. Behnke M, Kosakowski M, Kaczmarek ŁD. Social Challenge and Threat Predict Performance and Cardiovascular Responses During Competitive Video Gaming. Psychology of Sport and Exercise. 2020;46:101584. doi: 10.1016/j.psychsport.2019.101584.
4. Bigalke JA, John‐Henderson NA, Carter JR. Stress Appraisal Is Associated With Sympathetic Neural Reactivity to Mental Stress in Humans. Journal of Applied Physiology. 2025;138(1):55-65. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00678.2024.
5. O’Neill RM, Kern KB, Friedman SE, Sbarra DA, Hamann H, Ruiz J. Examining Impacts of Situational Stress on Cardiovascular Physiology During a Vigilance Task. 2025;87(3):197-206. doi: 10.1097/psy.0000000000001374.
6. Behnke M, Hase A, Kaczmarek ŁD, Freeman P. Blunted Cardiovascular Reactivity May Serve as an Index of Psychological Task Disengagement in the Motivated Performance Situations. Scientific Reports. 2021;11(1). doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-97670-0.
7. Int-Veen I. Cognitive Appraisal Modulates Theta Burst Stimulation Effects on Stress-Reactive Rumination and Affect. Cognitive Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience. 2025. doi: 10.3758/s13415-025-01314-z.
8. Day MA, Ward LC, Grover MP, Ehde DM, Illingworth OR, Jensen MP. The Roles of Race, Sex and Cognitions in Response to Experimental Pain. European Journal of Pain. 2020;24(6):1072-83. doi: 10.1002/ejp.1552.
9. Counts CJ, Ginty AT, Larsen JM, Kampf TD, John‐Henderson NA. Childhood Trauma and Cortisol Reactivity: An Investigation of the Role of Task Appraisals. Frontiers in Psychology. 2022;13. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.803339.
10. Harris C, Banks J, Edwards C, Hurst S, Hill J. Active Video Games as an Adjunct to Pulmonary Rehabilitation of Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Commentary on a Systematic Review. Journal of the Association of Chartered Physiotherapists in Respiratory Care. 2024;56(2):39-42. doi: 10.56792/wabg1646.
11. Jin Y, Bultinck F, Meng L, Scheepers D, Steenbergen Hv. The Leiden Stroop-Like Stress Task: A Tool to Reveal Challenge-Threat Dynamics Using Graded Stress Induction. 2025. doi: 10.31234/osf.io/zve2s_v1.
12. Lee DH, Jung TP. A Virtual Reality Game as a Tool to Assess Physiological Correlations of Stress. 2020. doi: 10.48550/arxiv.2009.14421.
13. Ishaque S. Heart-Rate Variability Analysis for Stress Assessment in a Video-Game Setup. 2021. doi: 10.32920/16818799.
14. Hickey BA, Chalmers T, Newton PJ, Lin CT, Sibbritt D, McLachlan CS, et al. Smart Devices and Wearable Technologies to Detect and Monitor Mental Health Conditions and Stress: A Systematic Review. Sensors. 2021;21(10):3461. doi: 10.3390/s21103461.
15. Behnke M, Gross JJ, Kaczmarek ŁD. The Role of Emotions in Esports Performance. Emotion. 2022;22(5):1059-70. doi: 10.1037/emo0000903.
16. Vallerand RJ, Paquette V, Richard C. The Role of Passion in Psychological and Cardiovascular Responses: Extending the Field of Passion and Positive Psychology in New Directions. Frontiers in Psychology. 2022;12. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.744629.
17. Watier N. Subtle Threat Cues in Marketing Horror and Children’s Entertainment. Psychology of Popular Media. 2023;12(2):231-41. doi: 10.1037/ppm0000401.
18. Gamaiunova L, Brandt P-Y, Kliegel M. Challenge or Threat? The Effects of the Standard and a Second-Generation Mindfulness Intervention With Buddhist Practices on Cognitive Appraisals of Stress: Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Experiment Performed in Switzerland. Journal of Religion and Health. 2023;63(6):4773-92. doi: 10.1007/s10943-023-01964-8.
19. Long F, Pliskin R, Scheepers D. Leftists and Rightists Differ in Their Cardiovascular Responses to Changing Public Opinion on Migration. 2024. doi: 10.31234/osf.io/d4yc6.
20. Zhou N. Spiritual Opium and the Spiritual Opium War: A Cultural History of Arcade Games and Console Games in 1990s China. Media International Australia. 2024. doi: 10.1177/1329878x241239454.
21. Weerdmeester J, Rooij Mv, Rutger CMEE, Granic I. An Integrative Model for the Effectiveness of Biofeedback Interventions for Anxiety Regulation: Viewpoint (Preprint). 2019. doi: 10.2196/preprints.14958.
22. Weerdmeester J, Rooij Mv, Rutger CMEE, Granic I. An Integrative Model for the Effectiveness of Biofeedback Interventions for Anxiety Regulation: Viewpoint. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 2020;22(7):e14958. doi: 10.2196/14958.
23. Weerdmeester J, Rooij Mv, Maciejewski D, Rutger CMEE, Granic I. A Randomized Controlled Trial Assessing the Efficacy of a Virtual Reality Biofeedback Video Game: Anxiety Outcomes and Appraisal Processes. Technology Mind and Behavior. 2021;2(2). doi: 10.1037/tmb0000028.
24. Lebamovski P. The Influence of Virtual Reality on the Autonomic Nervous System. Innovative Stem Education. 2023;5(1):35-44. doi: 10.55630/stem.2023.0505.
25. Bjørner T, Schoenau‐Fog H. A Dynamic Engagement Model to Provide Ecological Awareness of the Climate Crisis Through Video Games. 2023. doi: 10.5117/9789463721196_ch04.
26. Bjørner T, Schoenau‐Fog H. 4. A Dynamic Engagement Model to Provide Ecological Awareness of the Climate Crisis Through Video Games. 2024:129-44. doi: 10.1515/9789048557219-005.
27. Rashid M, Szymczak J, Shah N, Lum N, Wong M. Commentary: Video Games and Stress: How Stress Appraisals and Game Content Affect Cardiovascular and Emotion Outcomes. Frontiers in Psychology. 2023;14. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1191123.
Downloads
Published
Submitted
Revised
Accepted
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.