From Ecosystem Strategies to Sustainable Sport Development: Structural Validation of a Human Resource Management Ecosystem Model in Sport Organizations

Authors

    Maryam Chitsaz Qazvini PhD student of sport management, department of physical education and sport sciences, Qa.C., Islamic Azad University, Qazvin, Iran.
    Mahdi Naderi Nasab * Assistant professor of sport management, department of physical education and sport sciences, Qa.C., Islamic Azad University, Qazvin, Iran Mehdynaderinasab@iau.ac.ir
    Seyed Abbas Biniaz Assistant professor, department of physical education and sport sciences, Qa.C., Islamic Azad University, Qazvin, Iran.
    Ali Khorjahani Assistant professor, department of physical education and sport sciences, Ta.C., Islamic Azad University, Takestan, Iran

Keywords:

human resource management ecosystem, sport organizations, PLS-SEM, structural model, talent management, value co-creation, sustainable sport development

Abstract

 Sport organizations increasingly depend on human resources located across organizational boundaries, including federations, clubs, public agencies, universities, professional communities, coaches, referees, medical specialists, technology providers, and volunteers. Although the emerging human resource management (HRM) ecosystem perspective provides a useful way to conceptualize such interdependence, empirical structural testing in sport remains limited. This study quantitatively evaluated a sport-specific HRM ecosystem model derived from an earlier qualitative phase. A cross-sectional quantitative study was conducted with 400 respondents from Iranian sport organizations and related professional groups. A 120-item researcher-developed questionnaire represented six higher-order domains and 15 main categories identified in the qualitative model. Content validity was assessed by 15 experts, pilot reliability was examined in 30 participants, and the measurement and structural models were evaluated using partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Internal consistency, composite reliability, average variance extracted, discriminant validity, predictive relevance, standardized path coefficients, t statistics, and coefficients of determination were examined. Reliability and convergent validity were supported for all six higher-order constructs (Cronbach's alpha = 0.96-0.98; composite reliability = 0.96-0.98; AVE = 0.56-0.61). Reported Q² values were positive (0.47-0.52). The construct labelled causal conditions was strongly associated with the HRM ecosystem (β = 0.95, t = 120.95), with R² = 0.917 for the HRM ecosystem. The HRM ecosystem (β = 0.96, t = 119.76), contextual conditions (β = 0.78, t = 88.61), and intervening conditions (β = 0.95, t = 121.23) were positively associated with ecosystem strategies and jointly accounted for R² = 0.937. Ecosystem strategies were strongly associated with outcomes (β = 0.96, t = 183.84; R² = 0.936). The findings provide strong internal support for the proposed structural pattern in this sample, but the cross-sectional, single-source design and unusually high coefficients preclude causal inference and require independent replication. The model offers a quantitative basis for examining sport HRM as a network-level system linking people, knowledge, talent, and performance across organizational boundaries.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adner, R., & Kapoor, R. (2010). Value creation in innovation ecosystems: How the structure of technological interdependence affects firm performance in new technology generations. Strategic Management Journal, 31(3), 306-333. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.821

Al Balushi, I. A. A., Muslim, N. A., & Khudari, M. (2023). The effect of human resources practices on sport organization's performance in Oman: The mediating role of leadership style. International Journal of Professional Business Review, 8(7), e02616. https://doi.org/10.26668/businessreview/2023.v8i7.2616

Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2008). Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4), 543-571. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mum032

Barclay, D., Higgins, C., & Thompson, R. (1995). The partial least squares (PLS) approach to causal modeling: Personal computer adoption and use as an illustration. Technology Studies, 2(2), 285-309.

Burke, C. M., & Morley, M. J. (2023). Toward a non-organizational theory of human resource management? A complex adaptive systems perspective on the human resource management ecosystem in (con)temporary organizing. Human Resource Management, 62(1), 31-53. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.22132

Buser, M., Woratschek, H., Dickson, G., & Schönberner, J. (2022). Toward a sport ecosystem logic. Journal of Sport Management, 36(6), 534-547. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsm.2021-0056

Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Donnelly, R., & Hughes, E. (2023). The HR ecosystem framework: Examining strategic HRM tensions in knowledge-intensive organizations with boundary-crossing professionals. Human Resource Management, 62(1), 79-95. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.22115

Emerson, K., Nabatchi, T., & Balogh, S. (2012). An integrative framework for collaborative governance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 22(1), 1-29. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mur011

Gerke, A. (2016). Towards a network model of innovation in sport: The case of product innovation in nautical sport clusters. Innovation: Management, Policy & Practice, 18(3), 270-288. https://doi.org/10.1080/14479338.2016.1237306

Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2022). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Lawshe, C. H. (1975). A quantitative approach to content validity. Personnel Psychology, 28(4), 563-575. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1975.tb01393.x

Likert, R. (1932). A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Archives of Psychology, 140, 1-55.

Misener, K., & Doherty, A. (2013). Understanding capacity through the processes and outcomes of interorganizational relationships in nonprofit community sport organizations. Sport Management Review, 16(2), 135-147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smr.2012.07.003

Shilbury, D., & Ferkins, L. (2011). Professionalisation, sport governance and strategic capability. Managing Leisure, 16(2), 108-127. https://doi.org/10.1080/13606719.2011.559090

Snell, S. A., Swart, J., Morris, S., & Boon, C. (2023). The HR ecosystem: Emerging trends and a future research agenda. Human Resource Management, 62(1), 5-14. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.22158

Taylor, T., & McGraw, P. (2006). Exploring human resource management practices in nonprofit sport organisations. Sport Management Review, 9(3), 229-251. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1441-3523(06)70027-4

Taylor, T., Doherty, A., & McGraw, P. (2008). Managing people in sport organizations: A strategic human resource management perspective. Routledge.

Woratschek, H., Horbel, C., & Popp, B. (2014). The sport value framework - A new fundamental logic for analyses in sport management. European Sport Management Quarterly, 14(1), 6-24. https://doi.org/10.1080/16184742.2013.865776

Published

2026-09-27

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Chitsaz Qazvini, M., Naderi Nasab, M. ., Biniaz, S. A. ., & Khorjahani, A. . (2026). From Ecosystem Strategies to Sustainable Sport Development: Structural Validation of a Human Resource Management Ecosystem Model in Sport Organizations. Game Nexus. https://game-nexus.org/index.php/gamenexus/article/view/51

Similar Articles

11-20 of 36

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)