Identifying Motivational Climates in Tech-Enhanced Training Environments: Coach–Athlete Dyads

Authors

    Laura Bennett Department of Educational Psychology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
    Jennifer Torres * Department of Educational Psychology, University of California, Berkeley, USA jtorres@berkeley.edu
    Neha Sharma Department of Clinical Psychology, University of Delhi, Delhi, India

Keywords:

motivational climate, coach–athlete dyads, technology-enhanced training, sport psychology, digital feedback, athlete motivation

Abstract

This study aimed to qualitatively explore and identify the dimensions of motivational climates emerging in technology-enhanced training environments, focusing on coach–athlete dyads. A qualitative research design was employed, using semi-structured interviews with 19 participants from the United States, including both athletes and coaches across diverse sporting disciplines. Participants were recruited through purposive sampling, ensuring direct experience with technology-integrated training. Data collection continued until theoretical saturation was achieved. Interviews lasted between 45 and 75 minutes, were audio-recorded, and transcribed verbatim. NVivo 14 software facilitated thematic analysis, which followed an inductive process of open coding, categorization, and theme development. Trustworthiness was ensured through constant comparison, memoing, and reflexive interpretation. Four overarching themes were identified. (1) Digital feedback and performance tracking: athletes valued real-time monitoring, personalized goals, and collaborative data review, though some reported stress and overreliance on metrics. (2) Coach–athlete relationship dynamics: technology enhanced communication and transparency but also altered authority structures, with athletes increasingly relying on digital feedback over coach judgment. (3) Athlete motivation and psychological climate: gamification features fueled competition and confidence but also heightened anxiety and disengagement risks when data reflected poor progress. (4) Barriers and ethical concerns: participants highlighted privacy issues, unequal access to devices, varying digital literacy, and sustainability challenges in maintaining long-term engagement with technological tools. The findings suggest that technology reshapes motivational climates by amplifying both empowering and disempowering elements. While digital tools enhance accountability, autonomy, and feedback quality, they also risk creating ego-involving pressures and ethical dilemmas. Coaches and organizations must strike a balance between leveraging the benefits of technology and safeguarding athlete well-being, autonomy, and equity. This study contributes to motivational climate theory by integrating digital, relational, and cultural dimensions within modern sport contexts.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Borrego CC, Monteiro D, Benson AJ, Miguel M, Teixeira E, Silva C. Disentangling the Effects of Ego and Task-Involving Climate Perceptions on Cohesion in Youth Sport. Sport Exercise and Performance Psychology. 2021;10(4):558-70. doi: 10.1037/spy0000270.

2. Wineinger TO, Fry MD, Long H, Brown TC. The Influence of Ego-Involving Climates on Perceived Competence and Commitment for U.S. Masters Swimmers. Frontiers in Psychology. 2025;16. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1574429.

3. Fry MD, Hogue CM, Iwasaki S, Solomon GB. The Relationship Between the Perceived Motivational Climate in Elite Collegiate Sport and Athlete Psychological Coping Skills. Journal of Clinical Sport Psychology. 2021;15(4):334-50. doi: 10.1123/jcsp.2020-0002.

4. Angelo DL, Duda JL, Balaguer I, Rosado A, Corrêa MdF, Anunciação L, et al. Psychometric Properties of the Coach-Created Empowering and Disempowering Motivational Climate Questionnaire (EDMCQ-C) in a Brazilian Sample of Athletes: An ESEM Approach. Sustainability. 2023;15(6):4709. doi: 10.3390/su15064709.

5. Kim E, Park H, Choi H. Analysis of the Relationship Between Athletes'; Attitudes Toward Doping, Sport Orientation, and Perceived Motivational Climate in Sport Among Collegiate Athletes. The Korean Journal of Sports Medicine. 2021;39(3):102-9. doi: 10.5763/kjsm.2021.39.3.102.

6. Moore EWG, Weiller-Abels K. Psychosocial Climates Differentially Predict 12- To 14-Year-Old Competitive Soccer Players’ Goal Orientations. Women in Sport and Physical Activity Journal. 2020;28(2):111-8. doi: 10.1123/wspaj.2019-0007.

7. Gómez-López M, Borrego CC, Silva C, Granero‐Gallegos A, Hernández JG. Effects of Motivational Climate on Fear of Failure and Anxiety in Teen Handball Players. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2020;17(2):592. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17020592.

8. Jakobsen AM. How Can Autonomy Support From the Coach, Basic Psychological Needs, and the Psychological Climate Explain Ego and Task Involvement? 2023. doi: 10.20944/preprints202306.1345.v1.

9. Jakobsen AM. The Relationship Between Motivation, Goal Orientation, and Perceived Autonomy Support From the Coach in Young Norwegian Elite Hockey Players. Frontiers in Psychology. 2022;13. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.811154.

10. Jakobsen AM. The Relationship Between Motivation, Perceived Motivational Climate, Task and Ego Orientation, and Perceived Coach Autonomy in Young Ice Hockey Players. Baltic Journal of Health and Physical Activity. 2021;13(2):79-91. doi: 10.29359/bjhpa.13.2.08.

11. Hogue CM. An Ego-Involving Motivational Climate Can Trigger Inflammation, a Threat Appraisal, and Basic Psychological Need Frustration in an Achievement Context. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology. 2024;46(1):34-49. doi: 10.1123/jsep.2023-0104.

12. Ismail FH, Karim ZA, Ahmad MF, Nasir NI. Goal Orientation Patterns and Preferred Coaching Leadership Styles Among Football Players of District Training Centre in Seberang Perai Tengah, Penang, Malaysia. Fiz Pol. 2024;24(2):129-35. doi: 10.56984/8zg5608n9f.

13. Weiss MR, Moehnke HJ, Kipp LE. A United Front: Coach and Teammate Motivational Climate and Team Cohesion Among Female Adolescent Athletes. International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching. 2021;16(4):875-85. doi: 10.1177/17479541211006905.

14. Fontana MS, Fry MD, Moore EWG. Exploring the Relationship Between Athletes’ Perceptions of Their Team Motivational Climate and Their Sport Shame. The Sport Psychologist. 2022:1-9. doi: 10.1123/tsp.2021-0145.

15. Erdész A, Fry MD, Fry AC. College Baseball Players’ Perception of Their Team Climate and Mental Health. Journal of Human Sport and Exercise. 2023;18(4). doi: 10.14198/jhse.2023.184.06.

16. Sokoloff DM, Petrie TA, Chu TL. The Relationship of Coach-Created Motivational Climate to Teamwork Behaviors in Female Collegiate Athletes. The Sport Psychologist. 2023;37(1):40-7. doi: 10.1123/tsp.2022-0070.

17. Moulds K. How Important Is the Coach-Created Motivational Climate on Player Longevity? Itf Coaching & Sport Science Review. 2023;32(91):51-4. doi: 10.52383/itfcoaching.v32i91.494.

18. Scott CE, Fry MD, Wineinger TO, Iwasaki S, Long H, Brown TS. Athletes’ Perceived Team Climate, Social Support, and Optimistic Thoughts During the COVID-19 Pandemic. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2024;22(1):46. doi: 10.3390/ijerph22010046.

19. Raya-Castellano PE, García‐Calvo T, López-Gajardo MÁ, Marzano-Felisatti JM, González JJP. The Pre-Match Talk: A Multiple-Method Examination of Youth-Elite Football Coaches’ Motivational Content. International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching. 2023;19(2):604-19. doi: 10.1177/17479541231207254.

20. Chu TL, Treacy A, Moore EWG, Petrie TA, Albert E, Zhang T. Intersectionality Matters: Gender, Race/Ethnicity, and Sport Level Differentiate Perceived Coach-Created Motivational Climates and Psychological Needs. Sport Exercise and Performance Psychology. 2024;13(1):59-75. doi: 10.1037/spy0000331.

21. Laroëre BM, Horová E, Mudrák J, Crossan W, Třebický V. Empowering or Disempowering? The Impact of Coach-Created Motivational Climates on Engagement and Team Cohesion in Rhythmic Gymnastics. 2024. doi: 10.31219/osf.io/vfe6d.

22. Iwasaki S, Fry MD, Hogue CM. Mindful Engagement Mediates the Relationship Between Motivational Climate Perceptions and Coachability for Male High School Athletes. Journal of Clinical Sport Psychology. 2022;16(3):234-53. doi: 10.1123/jcsp.2020-0016.

23. Pineda-Espejel HA, León J, Alonso JLN, Sánchez RM, Trejo M, Morales‐Sánchez V. Motivational Context and Perfectionism Traits in Pediatric Sports. Sustainability. 2021;13(21):11639. doi: 10.3390/su132111639.

24. Wang X, Sun Z, Yuan L, Dong D, Dong D. The Association Between Team Behaviors and Competitive Anxiety Among Team-Handball Players: The Mediating Role of Achievement Goals. Frontiers in Psychology. 2024;15. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1417562.

25. Charles A, Buckinx F, Mouton A, Reginster JY, Bruyère O. Motivational Climate of Group Exercise Sessions in Nursing Homes. Archives of Public Health. 2020;78(1). doi: 10.1186/s13690-020-00425-y.

26. Manzano-Sánchez D, Postigo-Pérez L, López MG, Valenzuela AV. Study of the Motivation of Spanish Amateur Runners Based on Training Patterns and Gender. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2020;17(21):8185. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17218185.

27. Martínez CA, Cavas-García F, Suárez AD, Martínez-Moreno A. Psychological Profile and Competitive Performance in Group Aesthetic Gymnastics. Frontiers in Sports and Active Living. 2021;3. doi: 10.3389/fspor.2021.625944.

28. Товт ВВ, Susla V. Game Technologies of Edutainment and Gamification in Sports Training at the Initial Stages of Training Young Athletes. Scientific Bulletin of Uzhhorod University Series «pedagogy Social Work». 2024(1(54)):220-4. doi: 10.24144/2524-0609.2024.54.220-224.

29. Ramirez A, Delariarte CF. The Spectrum of First-Generation Student-Athletes’ Mental Toughness: Moderation and Mediation Analyses. 2023:4-14. doi: 10.2991/978-94-6463-356-6_2.

30. Rodrigues F, Macedo R, Cid Ls, Teixeira D, Marinho DA, Monteiro D. Sex Differences in Relationships Between Perceived Coach-Induced Motivational Climates, Basic Psychological Needs, and Behavior Regulation Among Young Swimmers. Perceptual and Motor Skills. 2020;127(5):891-911. doi: 10.1177/0031512520926805.

31. Ali Y, Kotera Y, Cotterill M, Edwards AM, Palmer S. Sport Emotions, Anxiety, Task and Ego Orientation in Pakistani Adolescents: Mediating Role of Coaching Athlete Purpose. 2025. doi: 10.20944/preprints202501.0334.v1.

32. Ali Y. Sport Emotions, Anxiety, Task and Ego Orientation in Pakistani Adolescents: Mediating the Role of Coaching in Athlete Purpose. Future. 2025;3(2):11. doi: 10.3390/future3020011.

33. Jakobsen AM. How Can Autonomy Support From a Coach, Basic Psychological Needs, and the Psychological Climate Explain Ego and Task Involvement? International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2023;20(21):6977. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20216977.

Downloads

Published

2025-01-01

Submitted

2024-09-26

Revised

2024-12-06

Accepted

2024-12-13

How to Cite

Bennett, L., Torres, J., & Sharma, N. (2025). Identifying Motivational Climates in Tech-Enhanced Training Environments: Coach–Athlete Dyads. Game Nexus, 2(1), 1-11. https://game-nexus.org/index.php/gamenexus/article/view/17

Similar Articles

1-10 of 23

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.